Personality is a term that has many general meanings.
Sometimes the word refers to the ability to get along well socially. For
example, we speak of experiences or relationships which are said to give a
person "more personality." The term also may refer to the most striking
impression that an individual makes on other people. We may say, "She has a
shy personality."
To a psychologist, personality is an area of
study that deals with complex human behaviour, including emotions, actions,
and cognitive (thought) processes. Psychologists study the patterns of
behaviour that make individuals different from one
another.
The nature of
personality
Personality types. For hundreds of years, people
have tried to group the vast differences among human beings into simple units.
Some of the resulting groupings divide people into personality types based on
certain characteristics.
The ancient Greek doctor Hippocrates
divided individuals into such types as sanguine (cheerful) and
melancholic (depressed). He attributed their behavioural differences to
a predominance of one of the body fluids. For example, Hippocrates believed
that a person was cheerful if blood (sanguis) was the dominant influence on
his or her behaviour.
Some of the more recent theories about
personality types have tried to associate body build and temperament.
Classifications based on body measurements were developed by two
psychiatrists, Ernst Kretschmer of Germany and William Sheldon of the United
States.
The Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, who studied
psychological characteristics, classified people as
introverts
or extroverts.
The
simplicity of personality-type theories is appealing, but it also limits their
value. An individual's behaviour is so complex, diverse, and variable that the
person cannot be sorted usefully into a simple
category.
Personality traits.
Related to personality-type theories is the search for
broad traits or dispositions to describe enduring differences among people.
One of the early workers in this field was the British psychologist William
McDougall. Personality traits are regarded as dimensions that range from high
to low. For example, anxiety is a trait that varies from the greatest anxiety
to the least anxiety. Most people have some degree of anxiety along the scale
between the two extremes. Psychologists have studied such personal attributes
as aggressiveness, dependency, and
extroversion-introversion.
Studies of personality traits help
reveal the relationships between an individual's different personal
attributes. For example, a group of children may be tested for intelligence
and may also be given questionnaires about their attitudes. In addition, they
may be asked to rate their own characteristics, and may be rated by their
teachers. The results are then correlated statistically to discover the
relationships among all this information.
Ratings and
self-reports.
Research on personality traits tends to rely heavily on
broad ratings of personality. In self-ratings, a person indicates the degree
to which he or she thinks he or she possesses certain personality
characteristics. Ratings may also be obtained from teachers, or others who
know the person or who have watched the person in special
situations.
These judgments may be affected by many types of
bias. A person may give the responses that he or she thinks are expected and
socially desirable, even if they are not true. Moreover, the answers may
reflect preconceptions and stereotypes (fixed ways of thinking), rather than
an accurate description of behaviour. Tests that ask a person to rate such
attributes as friendliness or adjustment provide broad self-characterizations
rather than detailed descriptions of behaviour. Consequently, the findings of
such tests may partly reveal the concepts and stereotypes that people apply to
themselves and to others. These findings may not necessarily reflect the
people's actual behaviour outside the test.
Some techniques are
designed to reduce the role of personal meanings and concepts. Other
approaches deliberately seek to clarify the individual's concepts about
himself or herself. These personal concepts are especially important in
theories that stress the role of the self and one's image of oneself. For
example, in his theory of self-realization, the American psychologist Carl R.
Rogers focuses on phenomenology--a person's private experiences and
perceptions.
Projective tests.
Some investigators have tried to avoid the problems of
relying on a person's ratings or reports about himself or herself by creating
indirect clinical techniques in the form of projective tests. These methods
require the person to respond to a situation in which there are no clear
guidelines and no right or wrong answers. The person may be asked how inkblots
appear to him or her on the Rorschach Test. Or the person may be
instructed to create a story about the characters in a series of pictures in
the Thematic Apperception Test. Projective techniques rely on a trained
clinician to interpret the person's attributes indirectly from test behaviour.
The value of this approach for revealing aspects of personality is
controversial and is still being studied.
Freud's
psychoanalytic theory.
According to the Austrian physician Sigmund Freud, the
personality has three parts: (1) the id, which represents instinctive impulses
of sex and aggression; (2) the ego, which represents the demands of the real
world; and (3) the super-ego, or conscience, which represents standards of
behaviour incorporated into the personality during
childhood.
According to Freud, mental life is characterized by
internal conflicts that are largely unconscious. Impulses from the id seek
immediate gratification, but they conflict with the ego and the superego. When
unacceptable impulses threaten to emerge, a person experiences anxiety. To
reduce this anxiety, the person may use various personality defences. The
person may, for example, displace (transfer) his or her emotions to less
threatening objects. A child who is afraid to express aggression toward his or
her father may become angry at his or her pet dog
instead.
Freud's ideas have had great influence on the study of
personality, but they are highly controversial. Many of his ideas had to be
modified severely by psychologists to take greater account of social and
environmental variables.
Personality and
environment
Trait theories and psychoanalytic theories both
assume that broad internal personality dispositions determine behaviour in
many situations. However, research on the consistency of various personality
traits indicates that what people do, think, and feel may depend greatly on
the specific conditions in which their behaviour occurs.
People
may be honest in one situation and dishonest in another. They may be passive
in some situations but aggressive in other situations or with different
people. Many contemporary approaches to the study of personality therefore
emphasize the role of specific social experiences and environmental events in
the development and modification of behaviour. Psychologists are gradually
moving away from broad theorizing about the nature of personality. Instead,
they are studying the conditions that determine complex
behaviour.
Personality development.
Some psychologists have examined the effects of early
experiences on later personality development. Other investigators have studied
the stability of particular patterns of personality over long periods of time.
Their findings suggest that such tendencies as striving to achieve may persist
to some degree from childhood into adulthood. However, research has also shown
that personality continues to change as a result of new experiences and
modifications in the environment.
Throughout their development,
people learn about themselves and their world by observing other people and
events. They also learn by trying new kinds of behaviour directly. The rewards
and punishments they receive after trying various patterns of behaviour affect
their future behaviour in similar situations. People also learn by observing
the results of the behaviour of such social models as their parents. Suppose
children repeatedly see adults succeed in antisocial or criminal acts. If they
see such behaviour rewarded, they are more likely to copy it than if it is
punished. Children more readily imitate models who are powerful or who reward
or take care of them.
As children develop, they copy some of the
behaviour of many models, including their friends as well as their parents.
They combine aspects of their behaviour into new patterns. Through direct and
observational learning and cognitive growth, they also acquire standards and
values that help them regulate and evaluate their own behaviour. Gradually,
people develop an enormous set of potential behaviours. The particular
behaviour patterns they show in specific situations depend on motivational
factors.
People's cognitive and social learning experiences vary as a
result of the particular social and cultural conditions to which they are
exposed in the home, at school, and in other environments. Personality traits
may predict many important aspects of behaviour. But the setting in which
behaviour occurs often provides the best predictions about what people will
do. Thus, although extensive differences among people are found in most human
actions, considerable uniformity and regularity can occur when environmental
conditions are very powerful. Strong success experiences in a new situation,
for example, may override the effects of past failure experiences and of
personality traits in determining future reactions to that new situation.
Similarly, prolonged or intense environmental changes, such as lengthy
hospitalization or imprisonment, may lead to major personality changes. A
person who has severe difficulties in personal relationships is said to be
suffering from a personality disorder.
Emotional reactions.
During the course of development, we acquire intense emotional reactions
to many stimuli. Events that once were neutral may become either pleasurable
or painful as the result of conditioning
Some reactions may involve strong anxiety and can
have crippling effects. For example, children who have frightening experiences
with dogs may become afraid of all dogs. This fear may generalize (spread)
even more widely to other animals and to such objects as fur coats, or hair.
Such fears are especially hard to unlearn because these people tend to avoid
all contact with situations that provoke fear. Consequently, these people
prevent themselves from having experiences that might eliminate their
fear--petting harmless dogs, for example. Emotional upsets of this kind may
also be acquired by observing the fear reactions of other
people.
As a result of social learning, we generalize from our
experiences to new but similar or related situations. But we do not generalize
indiscriminately. A young boy may learn to express physical aggression in many
settings, including school, play, and home. But he also learns not to be
aggressive in other situations, such as when visiting his
grandparents.
Personality change.
Research on cognitive and social learning processes is
leading to new forms of psychotherapy to help people who have psychological
problems. Some of these problems are the result of learning deficits. For
example, some people lack fundamental academic and vocational skills, such as
reading proficiency. Individuals who have inadequate relations with others
need to learn essential interpersonal skills. Some people have these basic
skills, but they suffer because of emotional fears and
inhibitions.
Psychotherapy aimed at changing personality tends to
stress insight into the history through which the problems developed. Learning
methods try to change the disturbing behaviour itself by carefully planned
relearning and conditioning techniques. Still other forms of personality
change may be achieved by creating special environments for learning more
adaptive personality patterns.
Additional
resources
Carver, Charles S. and Scheier. Perspectives on
Personality. Ed 3. Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, U.S.A.,
1995.
Cook, Mark. Levels of Personality. Holt, Rinehart and
Winston, London, 1984.
Funder, David C. The Personality Puzzle.
W.W. Norton, New York, U.S.A., 1996.
Damon, William. Social and
Personality Development: Infancy Through Adolescence. Norton, New York,
1983.